Parents Should Have a License to Have Children

Question of Policy 13. Parents should soak up a license for having barbarianren. I come back so. Its pretty ridiculous that anyone can procreate and keep the kids, but you have go to through red tape, often for years , to ad pick out. Everyone should be unavoidable to take hold parenting classes through an unbiased (aka non-religious) source, like a hospital. I verify non-religious because the discussions go away undoubtedly deviate to moral rearing, when the biggest problems are with physical and synthetic raising. I have no problem with kids being raised with religion, of course.Now, we cant assure people getting pregnant un little we have mandatory sterilization of some(prenominal) peoplebut, we really couldnt do that with our rules on medicine (and people change as they age). However, the moment you go to your doctor for your first appointment, you should have to polarity up for those parenting classes. If you really want the kids, you allow for make quantify for t he classes. I dont really care how busy you are. Im in class or functional for about 12 hours per day, and if I got pregnant, I would make the damn time because it would be for the well-being of my children. Pro- 1.Less accidents (parents are informed of different precautions with children). 2. Precursor for unhealthiness prevention (blood tests could determine diseases) 3. Will baby be raised in a psychologically constant environment? (If one of the parents is a cozy offender, parental rights exit not be allowed). 4. May lead to less crime (Offenders are often kn give birth to be raised in a deviant environment). Con- 1. The population-replacement level is already low. 2. It interferes with our right to reproduce. 3. It is costly (doctors depart have to operate on every woman, and be able to sneak the process). . How are you going to control sexual behavior? * 5 years ago * * * No. * 5 years ago * Report make fun 0%0Votes * Verity No, and heres why 1. While it feels logical on some level, the administrative challenge of determining fit parents is mind-boggling. Does it require a financial means test? A psychological evaluation? A visit to a marital counselor to ensure a stable marriage? Even the lowest bar say, attending a some hours of parenting clases, which most hosptials encourage and offer at low or no cost requires making judgements about culture and values that are dicey. . The controlling truth is that parents can look good on paper and kick the bucket in practice, and vice versa. One of the best moms I know was 20, single and employed as a cashier when her daughter was born. Nothing in her history suggests shed be so competent and loving, but thither it is. And weed of well-heeled, highly educated men and women myself included struggle with the transition. Parenting licenses would likely be tainted by the same accusations facing our legal system do the affluent have an advantage? Is that just? 3.Since the act of conceiving a child o ccurs far outside the reach of the law, how would we regulate it? Would women be forced to take pregnancy tests? Thats a funny twist in the abortion debate, actually. Is there a right to choose to become a parent, and if so, can the kingdom stop you? Would men and women who fail a licensing test be cause to take birth control? What if theyre morally opposed? (After all, you may opt out of military service for religious and moral objections, if they can be confirmed by church membership or a homogeneous proof. ) 4. What happens to the kids born to unlicensed parents?Are they forcibly taken away from their parents? Who gets them? Again, theres a potentially ugly social justice issue there unfortunate children, possibly of color, being given to affluent parents, possibly white, because we define comely parenting by a standard that doesnt apply universally. (When a friend espouse a second child, she learned that each child had to have his own bedroom. In a pricey city, if we have a second kid, theres no way theyll both have their own rooms but if the maintain is imposing rules, they may well favor the affluent in slipway that are unjust or bizarre. 5. Assuming unlicensed parents have children, how go out the state pay for costs associated with those childrens care? Most states youth and family operate offices are already woefully underfunded and many are tragically ineffective. 6. It will become a pricey and chaotic legal battleground. Some will want same-sex couples to be refused parenting licenses others will argue that unwed parents are undeserving. The coquette battles will cost millions, and will probably not result in substantially better parenting.In the end, I think thats really the challenge will the licensing process create better parents? Licensing is a one-time act, and an all or nought proposal. You get the license or you dont. But parenting doesnt work like that. Its a gradual process, with days where we get it right and days when we just apparently screw up. You can license a driver because there are, in general, a finite set of circumstances you must be fain for behind the wheel. Parenting licensure could never be that simple, and so it is doomed. Good luck