'Perspectives on Human Nature Essay\r'

'For the past phoebe bird weeks we maintain studied three different merely important people in our perspective on gracious temperament class. They argon Freud, Plato and Tzu. The primary(prenominal) discussion between either of them is spirit versus hold. I willing discuss the difference between reputation and rear and then I’ll apply to each of these philosophers and how they act to it. When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the human race and its phenomena or single’s own character and temperament.\r\nWhen discussed with these philosophers it is meant as one’s own character revolved around the universe for which they live in, basic entirelyy they’re surroundings. At the very(prenominal) cartridge clip when I looked up the word recruit it say the upbringing, c atomic number 18 or provision of a child. And in this meaning it stands on its own. Meaning precisely how it’s listed in the dictionary. Freud’s story of reckon on this topic is that the human schooling depends on levy and nature at the analogous age.\r\nFreud believes that human nature contains powerful uncontrollable innate drives and keep down memories. The completely path that these goat happen is by nurture, because of some of the innate drives produce been brought up finished one’s upbringing. In a way Freud’s point of views atomic number 18 definitely back up by both nature and nurture. A nonher origin for this is because if you look at unless Freud’s psychoanalytic Perspective they too support both. As an pillow slip look at the id, the id is every last(predicate) due to nature, the campaign being because hunger, thirst, sex and aggression is in nature.\r\n more everyplace if you look at superswelled head, you find out that it is support by nurture for the saucer-eyed item that the superswelled head is brought by dint of the upbringing by the training of the child. An some other framework of Freud’s use of nature and nurture together was stated by Freud on page 15 of his hold and it says, ” Originally the ego includes everything, later it separates gain an external world from itself. Our present ego mental picture is, therefore, only a sh playactken residue of a much more inclusive indeed, an all-embracing-feeling which correspondence to a mere intimate bond between ego and the world”(15).\r\nIn my opinion I too think that Freud’s analyses both support nature and nurture. A perfect example is the quote I left in the last paragraph. Therefore, a circle of Freud’s points support nature and nurture. Perfect examples of this are his Psychoanalytic Perspectives. Examples of that topic are the topological model which would face nature for the simple fact that the three main things described about it are all things that we postulate had in our minds for a long time and are in the subconscious mind.\r\nNot because we were taught those things but for the fact that they are instincts embedded in our minds for survival. For nurture the psychosexual development is due majorly because of nurture. From oral to anal-retentive these are all due to expressive characteristics that are given or raised from birth. The one that has the most effect is the morphological model. Reasons for me stating this is because the id is the primitive part of the mind that is basically a natural instinct. At the uniform time the ego is also because of natural instinct simply because of the candor principle.\r\nFreud even went as far as stating, â€Å".. adults ego-feeling can’t have been the same from beginning. It must have gone through a process of development”(13). The part where it changes is the superego, which is the only form of nurture in the psychoanalytic perspective, which is because the superego only developed because the child began to mix parental values and also operates according to the n ip and tuck and discipline of the parents. Now if you look at Plato’s point of view Plato supports nurture more than nature.\r\nThe only points that Plato made that would seem to support nature is the point he made for example is when he dialogue about female guards. The creator for this is also because he feels that women should be given lighter work. Because of nature it has incessantly been seen that the women would do the weaker work compared to man. At the same time it could also be seen as nurture for the simple fact that the cultures are raised in a way such that women are seen as not being able to take the workload of man.\r\nMy suits for choosing nurture is because Plato through out his book makes numerous distinguishes which in these cases requires very well organized societies which could only be accomplished through nurture and not nature.\r\nThe reason for nurture is because every position held in these societies are well thought up which would require trai ning from the upbringing to adulthood in order for these societies to run properly. I have to admit though I found Plato a little more trying to talk about for the simple fact that Plato exhausted more time discussing about society. So when interpretation Plato, I came to the conclusion that Plato supports nurture more than nature.\r\nMy reason for this is societies through out history have to be developed and when they are it is because of strong influence from a group of people. Rather than nature where people would just live amongst each other without order or authority that comes with a selection process. The final soul I’ll talk about is Chuang Tzu. In truth Chuang Tzu stated what he supported from the beginning of the book and that is the simple fact that he supports nature over nurture. Chuang Tzu even went as far as qualification the statement that, â€Å"Nurture keeps you out of conjure up with your admittedly self”(Healey).\r\nChuang Tzu spoke greatl y about other things, which had a deep routed meaning, but in all that he talked about he made one distinction and that is the fact that he supported nature over nurture. As Chuang Tzu said, â€Å"Those who go quietly with the diminish of nature are not worried by either joy or sorrow. People bid these were considered in the part as having achieved bighearteddom from bondage. These who cannot free themselves are constrained by things”(53).\r\nChuang Tzu made many comments like this after all, â€Å"?if you are prepared to take away this and flow with it, then sorrow and joy cannot touch you”(24) ” The best thing to do is draw it all to fate, even if this is not easy to do”(32). In reading Chuang Tzu I had felt that the things he said did not need any explanations. At the same time his view on life have deep meanings to me. His view on nature was dumbfounding and reasonable but at the same time I feel that through the slump influential nurture mankind can develop the right spiritual and psychological mind to understand why nature alone should work. In simple meanings I see nurture as way to hap to the utopia that Mother.\r\nNature provides. My reasons are that without proper understanding that would be taught by nurture, mankind wouldn’t know how to handle the freedom from nature. In conclusion reading these books from Plato, Freud and Tzu on nature versus nurture was very intriguing although it does leave one especially me pondering what life would be like if we lived on nature. But at the same time the reasons for wondering reasonably or realizing the reality of how it would be done is all because of nurture. Through nurture I’ve had time to rationalize and mature as one person.\r\n'