.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Military Force and Transnational Terrorism

In the support against terrorism there is an contrariety in the discussion on the effectiveness of armed services follow out. On the one hand, some academics (Gray, 1993: 17-23; Cronin, 2006) swear that armed forces armament unit is compose necessary and that in its absence seizure separate anti-terrorist policies ordain evoke useless. On the other hand, other scholars claim that military go through drop be harmful and has incentives for the radicalisation of terrorist groups (Duyvesteyn, 2008: 337-339). The aim of this experiment is to hit the books the strategic utility of military force in countering transnational terrorism using Al Qaeda as a case study to sick light on the arguments. In the first part of the essay we result study the causes that demand political sympathiess to use military force to tackle terrorism and the limitations that these present. In the second part we will consider the consequences derived from military action. Finally, we will questi on the benefits of alternative counterterrorist policies in comparison to military action.\n consort to Duyvesteyn (2008), there are six-spot main strategies that Governments follow in order to apply military force to counter terrorism. In the first place, the use of military force groundwork be justified as a method to support government authorities to enforce faithfulness and re-establish order. Countries that have been defined as breeding grounds for terrorist cells can experience the militarisation of their territory, as happened with Iraq or Afghanistan. Nevertheless, the deployment of troops can be used by terrorist groups in favour of their make propaganda, giving evidence of the point of subordination of the group to the repression undertaken by the powerful ruling classes. In order for the military action not to be delegitimized it is substantive that governments identify the specific purposes of terrorist groups so that use of force is accepted not to be costless ( Duyvesteyn, 2008: 335). Secondly, during the Bush administration pre-emp...

No comments:

Post a Comment